How much did you already know about the Juarez femicides
prior to entering this class? How did Entry Denied by Ethne
Lubheid and Desert Blood by la Profe provide a historical,
cultural, political, and social context in which to better understand the
misogynistic murders of young women and girls on the El Paso/Juarez border? Be
sure to discuss one specific chapter in each book that most moved you, shocked
you, or otherwise provoked an emotional response. How effective
was Gregory Nava's film, Bordertown, at raising your
consciousness about the Juarez femicides?
I first learned about the Juarez femicides when I took
Chicano 10A with you in the fall of my freshman year of college. I had always
kept them in the back of my mind but feel so helpless about them because I know
how much silence surrounds these murders. Both Entry Denied and Desert Blood
served as important sources in helping me understand the historical, cultural,
political, and social contexts of these murders. Of course Desert Blood helped
me manifest a deeper understanding because the novels’ focus is primarily around
these murders.
In Entry Denied I know that chapter 5, Rapes, Asylum, and
the U.S. Border Patrol speaks directly about the crimes committed against women
at the U.S.-Mexico border, specifically in the section under ‘Rapes That Remain
Unrepresentable as Crimes’. This entire chapter was one that moved me the most
from this undeniably, shocking novel. While I know that I have learned that
women were once seen and treated as property of men and that we just very
recently gained the ability to vote, learning about the injustices inflicted on
women still shocks and resonates with me. I was appalled after reading, “rape
was an offense committed by one male against another male’s property, and the
seriousness ascribed to rape depended on the status of the males involved” (pg.
103). Learning that the definition of rape was once utterly and completely
connected to males angers me so much, I just do not understand how rape could
ever solely boil down to men and the offenses made to them and not to the
violence and victims of these acts. It is just so heart wrenching to think that
women were placed in a such a low social category that they really did not matter in matters that involve
them completely. Lubheid shares that, “Rapes of women of color, poor women, and
“unchaste” women often did not count within official categories of rape”. The
most shocking was that then says, “… these exclusions also shape contemporary
institutional responses”. I know I should not be shocked because I have learned
again and again that those in power do not care to help the less fortunate
because of all different types of interests, a truth which is highlighted in
both Entry Denied and Desert Blood, but it’s a cold, sad truth that I wish were
not true. It was also in this chapter that I learned that rape obviously serves
a deeper function, to show these Mexican women, quien es el mero mero, who is
boss, and in essence to produce, or reproduce the hierarchal social
relationships.
In Desert Blood, the chapter that most moved me, or in
other words, pissed me off the most, was chapter 45 with the opening being a
piece of the newspaper that Ivon is reading regarding the whole scandal she was
a part of. As I was reading the article I felt like I was Ivon and as I was
getting to the end I started thinking, “No, NO THEY ARE NOT making this J.W.
guy a fucking hero right now?!” Sure enough, Officer Jeremy Wilcox was being
recognized for “infiltrating” the operation. This chapter, especially the first
time I read it, really opened my mind to thinking that the people we trust in
may just be the people who harm our communities the most, and many cases have
proven this to be true. It is another sad reality to realize that these people
can be corrupt and do have the power and power extended from others to cover up
their dirty deeds. It is sad that innocent people have to suffer at the hands
of people like this and will never get justice because they fall into the
categories that Lubheid mentions, poor and/or colored—otherwise seen as
unimportant.
If I had not learned about the Juarez murders prior to
Gregory Nava’s film, Bordertown, I know that watching it would have done
a good job of raising my consciousness. From his film we learn that solely
women are the targets of these murders, also where these murders are taking
place, as well as how long they have been taking place. Moreover, we learn that
much silence surrounds these novels because no one, especially in El Paso,
gives them the magnitude of attention they need and deserve. While I do
acknowledge that this film offers great historical, cultural and political
context and addresses the femicides, I think that the focus falls perhaps too
much on the plot of the film. I don’t know, there is also something about
making issues like this a part of a movie that does not sit well with me
because I think people distance themselves from the issues as opposed to caring
for them, perhaps because I think that they think, “Solo es pelicula.”, you
know? For example, people see that in the film, Bordertown, the
government is involved with the murders and then they may grow disbelief, but
then realize it is just part of the movie as opposed to maybe questioning
whether it just may be that the government is in on such murders, and by the
end they totally dismiss the issues at hand.
No comments:
Post a Comment