I had first began learning about
the Juárez femicides about a year ago, which led me to do my Chican@ Studies
10B final on maquiladoras on the U.S.-Mexico border. I’ve said this many times
in other posts but the week on the femicides was the hardest for me
emotionally. I have a physical reaction now when I’m watching or reading
something about the murders. Desert Blood
by la Profe felt so very real to me. I was reading the book while walking
across campus and I could not handle one of the scenes with Irene and had to
sit down because I could not stop reading but I also could not handle what I
was feeling. Desert Blood put the
very real slut-shaming, victim blaming, misogynistic, racist social context to
the murders that illustrated through a story what I had read about previously. Entry Denied by Eithne Luibhéid gave me
the tools to historically and politically understand how misogyny works and is
in the blood of the femicides. There exists rape culture and victim blaming
within the asylum system that we read about in Luibhéid’s chapter “Rape,
Asylum, and the U.S. Border Patrol.” There is so much focus on there necessitating
a political reason to grant women asylum. “[Such] analysis appears predicated
on the idea that there are ‘political’ reasons for beating wives, and there are
‘personal’ reasons for beating wives” (Luibhéid 112). Blaming the victims and
letting off the perpetrators has been embedded in U.S. asylum laws as well as
within many other facets of U.S. border law. I did not learn much new
information from Gregory Nava’s Bordertown. But if the film was my first
encounter with the femicides then it would definitely provoke me to seek out
more information. The film also made the murders more real to me by being a
visual to what I have learned.
No comments:
Post a Comment